Couldn’t belief in God be nothing more than a social or biological phenomenon? This was the question posed by the skeptic. His point was obvious: if he could provide an explanation as to why people began to believe, or why people choose to believe, he would be one step closer to proving that there is no need for God.
Or would he?
When a question is framed in the way the skeptic phrased it, the anticipated answer is “yes.” After all, anything is possible, so why could this not also be a possibility?
To continue reading click here
Or would he?
When a question is framed in the way the skeptic phrased it, the anticipated answer is “yes.” After all, anything is possible, so why could this not also be a possibility?
To continue reading click here
RSS Feed
