Follow me
DyerThoughts
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • Study Materials >
      • Baptism
      • Essential Beliefs
      • The New Birth
      • 25 Questions about Baptism
      • Q&A about Salvation
      • Salvation is Free
      • How the Church Began
  • Contact
  • Seminar Topics

Atheist Universe Review (Part 8)

10/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Sometimes I can't tell whether Mills is lying or just plain ignorant. Pick your poison I guess. He makes a statement on Pg. 230 which is amazing. He says, "Cosmologists emphatically do not assert that the universe arose suddenly out of absolute nothingness." Well his assertion seems cute until evidence smacks it around a bit. So lets read some quotes from our evolutionary buddies. 

Robert Jastrow in God and the Astronomers (pg. 14)--"astronomical evidence leads to a biblical view of the origin of the world….the essential element in the astronomical and biblical accounts of Genesis is the same."

Athony Kenny in Five Ways (pg. 66)--“According to the Big Bang Theory, the whole matter of the universe began to exist at a particular time in the remote past. A proponent of such a theory, at least if he is an atheist, must believe that the matter of the universe came from nothing and by nothing.” 

Alexander Vilenkin in 2003 said, "With the proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape, they have to face the problem of a cosmic beginning" 

Those quotes should suffice to show that Atheists, Atronomers, and Physicists agree that the universe, contrary to the renowed (note the sarcasm) homeschooler David Mills, had a cosmic beginning out of nothing. 

What is further interesting about this is that Mr. Mills actually concedes an arguement I don't think he meant to concede. That is, to get around what the evidence shows a lot of scientists have posited a Quantum Vaccum. Basically they say our Universe came from 'nothing' but by 'nothing' they mean the Vaccum which is a sea of fluctuating energy. Well the whole argument is that you can't redefine 'nothing' to equal 'something' (aka Quantum Vaccum). But what David Mills does here is to say that the scientists don't argue that our Universe came from nothing, implying that they argue it came from something. Which means he is defining the Quantum Vaccum as 'something' rather than 'nothing'. Hence, he conceeded the argument to us. In do so he has to then erase the plethora of data which says the Universe (space/time/matter) had a beginning and have faith (blind faith) that it came from a Quantum Vaccum which we do not even know is there. Sorry Mr. Mills but I don't have enough faith to believe that. 

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Apologetics
    Apostles
    Archaeology
    Atheism
    Bible
    Christianity
    Dawkins
    Free Will
    God's Sovereignty
    Hermeneutics
    Inspiration
    Morality
    Moral Relativism
    Philosophy
    Psychoanalysis
    Reading
    Romans 7
    Science
    Scientism

    Picture

    Author

    I’m Billy Dyer a Teacher and Preacher of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. This is my blog page. It is focused on “coffee table apologetics”..... continue reading >>


    Follow Me:

    Tweets by @dyerthoughts84

    Archives

    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014

    RSS Feed


© 2015 dyerthoughts
Picture